Convenience stores sit at the intersection of retail, foodservice, and community. They generate over $335.5 billion in inside sales in 2024 alone, with prepared food and beverages representing nearly 61% of in-store profit dollars. Yet behind those margins lies a hidden battle: rising operating costs, aging assets, and the pressure to deliver a consistent customer experience across hundreds or thousands of locations.
For facilities leaders, the question is no longer if facilities programs should evolve, but how. The best approach to C-store facilities management must strike a balance between cost, quality, and scalability — three dimensions that historically force tradeoffs.
The Cost Challenge: Rising Expenses and Hidden Overages
Operating costs for convenience stores have surged. Direct store operating expenses (DSOE) rose 40% between 2021 and 2023, with repairs and maintenance climbing 38% in the same period. Utilities added another 22% increase in just two years, further straining budgets.
Even more concerning is what’s hidden inside invoices. Overages on labor, parts markups, minimum-hour charges, and duplicate dispatches are commonplace. Case studies show invoices padded with:
These “nickel-and-diming” practices can balloon costs by 10–15% per work order, eating into margins that are already razor thin. For a portfolio managing thousands of tickets annually, that translates into millions in lost savings.
The Quality Dilemma: Callbacks and Delayed Work
While costs rise, quality often lags. Benchmarking shows that multi-site operators average 14.7 days to complete work, nearly double the 8.7-day industry benchmark.
Callbacks add insult to injury. Roughly 19% of all break-fix work orders occur within 30 days of a prior repair in the same trade. In one case, repeat electrical and HVAC calls totaled $22,687 in repair spend at a single location.
For c-stores where refrigeration uptime, fuel pumps, and coffee programs drive daily revenue, poor service quality directly translates into customer dissatisfaction and lost sales.
The Scale Problem: Managing Complexity Across Footprints
The typical convenience store chain now operates hundreds, if not thousands, of geographically dispersed sites. Scaling in-house maintenance teams often means pushing the ratio of stores to facility managers past sustainable limits. Conversely, relying solely on third-party vendors without strong oversight creates quality inconsistencies.
In fact, managing too many vendors is cited as the most common challenge for distributed portfolios. Without central coordination, SLAs slip, provider accountability erodes, and administrative overhead balloons.
What Leading Programs Do Differently
The best approach for C-store facilities programs blends data, technology, and strategic partnerships. Leading operators are focusing on five key areas:
Programs that integrate invoice validation and benchmarking against historical data drive substantial savings. Dynamic audit engines have delivered $2.6 million in direct cost savings in the past 12 months for large c-store portfolios.
Monitoring KPIs like first-time fix rate, time to site, and average days to complete ensures performance transparency. Leaders consolidate providers, reward high performers, and eliminate underperformers to optimize both cost and quality.
Despite widespread adoption, 80% of CMMS users underutilize their systems, citing complexity and limited value. Next-generation platforms streamline workflows by:
Technologies like AI-powered troubleshooting assistants cut lookup time for technicians, reducing average job completion time by 1.4% per work order. Over thousands of jobs, these efficiency gains free capacity and keep revenue-generating assets online.
Building a Facilities Program Without Tradeoffs
The old FM adage has been “pick two: cost, quality, or scale.” Today’s convenience store leaders can no longer afford that compromise. Rising repair and maintenance costs — up 17.3% in just two years for grocers and retailers — coupled with customer expectations for fast, consistent service, demand a new model.
The best approach blends:
The Bottom Line
For facilities directors and VPs overseeing convenience store portfolios, the future of FM is not about patching today’s leaks — it’s about building resilient, transparent, and data-driven programs that can withstand tomorrow’s cost pressures.
Those who embrace this best-practice approach are already seeing results: lower cost per work order, fewer callbacks, and higher asset uptime. And in an industry where every dollar saved drops directly to the bottom line, the case for transforming C-store facilities management has never been clearer.
Let’s talk.
Get in touch and fill out the contact form below!